23:54 九点几处重要更新 » 豆瓣blog

九点自上线来,陆续有许多小的改进(比如API),今天,九点将迎来较为集中的更新:

1 “我的订阅” 名正言顺

我们将原有的豆瓣猜你会喜欢的博客&文章,从“我的订阅”移除,现在这里会是你完全掌控的博客阅读器。

新九点·我的订阅页面

新九点·我的订阅页面

2 九点首页有了 “你会感兴趣的文章”

现在起浏览九点首页,能读到九点根据你的阅读口味,推荐给你的文章。(不会太多,一次6条)

新九点·你会感兴趣的文章

新九点·你会感兴趣的文章

3 未登陆用户,也能用九点了

不需要注册或登录,也能用九点阅读器。点击“我的订阅”,自己添加几个博客地址,这就开始阅读之旅。

新九点·未登陆也能用

新九点·未登陆也能用

17:57 搜索营销开支持续增长[SEMPO] » lu's space: Blog

Search Engine Marketing Professional Organization (SEMPO)在3月23日发布的数据
2008年搜索营销开支为134亿美元。2009年预计上升到147亿美元。长期预测到2013年搜索营销开支达261亿美元。

搜索引擎营销支出,2008年,单位:亿美元
  支出 Paid Placement
付费排名
Organic SEO
自然排名优化
SEM Tech
搜索引擎营销技术
2008年 $134亿美元 88% (约$119亿美元) 11% (约$14亿美元) 1.1% (约$1.4亿美元)
数据来源:SEMPO

对比以前的SEMPO数据,付费搜索广告所占的比例有所增加,SEO保持不变。

 

15:48 Back to Basics: Using Motion Charts » Google Analytics Blog

The Motion Charts feature seems like an advanced tool, but it's actually designed for Analytics users at all levels. It's useful for spotting trends and relationships amongst individual variables when your visits may look flat as an aggregated set of data. Today, we'll illustrate how Motion Charts can graph and compare several keywords over time.

For example, let's say you want to graph traffic over time for each of the top keywords in the report below. You can easily do so by going to the Keywords report under the 'Traffic Sources' section.

Of course, you can click each keyword to see a graph over time, but this doesn't allow you to make comparisons.


However, Motion Charts allow you to graph and compare individual keyword performance over time. To access Motion Charts click the "Visualize" button at the top of most reports, such as the "Keyword" report located under "Traffic Sources."


You can now see that, except for a dip in traffic between Mar 23 and Mar 30, "google store" sent more traffic every day than the other keywords. "google downloads" sent the least amount traffic each day.

But this graph also provides a bonus. If you set the size of the dots to represent revenue, you can identify the days during which traffic actually paid off in revenue. For example, "google store" doesn't generate revenue every day (even when it sends lots of traffic). "google shop" and "google software" frequently generate revenue, but not as much as "google store".

Generating this graph is easy. Just follow these steps:

  1. Go the Keywords report (or any other report with table data) and click 'Visualize.'
  2. Select "Time" for the X-axis and "Visits" on the Y-axis. For Size, select "Revenue" (or any other metric you want to track).
  3. Now, select the keywords you want to graph (use the 'Select' box below the 'Size' menu) and select Trails. Press 'Play' or drag the slider across to the end of the time period.

After following these steps, a graph like the image above should appear. If you've selected a lot of keywords, your labels may bunch together, but you can drag and reposition the labels to see parts of the graph that are obscured.

Of course, you can use this technique on any report which has a 'Visualize' button. If you discover a new use for this technique, please post a comment and share your best practice with us.

Slides from What Craigslist wants and needs from DrizzleJeremy Zawodny's blog » 车东's shared items in Google Reader

As I previously mentioned, on Friday I attended the Drizzle Developer Day at Sun in Santa Clara. While there I had the chance to speak to the group while everyone ate their salad, pizza, and cookies.

The talk was titles "What Craigslist wants and needs from Drizzle" and is available as a Google Docs presentation here. I've also embedded a version of the slides below.

I should note here, as I did at the talk, that this presentation is neither comprehensive or completely representative. That is to say that I'm sure there are things I've forgotten. Plus, the fact that I was working with MySQL in other high-volume web shops before coming to Craiglist means that there's definitely some personal bias and pet peeves addressed in there too.

Anyway, that's what I presented.

Thanks to the fine folks at Sun (soon to be Oracle) for hosting and organizing the day. And special thanks to the Drizzle developers for getting together and showing the rest of us how things work and taking time to talk about their plans.

(comments)

07:19 The Percona Performance Presentations Are Online » MySQL Performance Blog

The 2009 Percona Performance Conference finished up last week, and was overall a resounding success. Thanks to all of the speakers, O’Reilly, and Sun/MySQL for help making it happen! Most slides have been uploaded; look for the stragglers over the next couple of days.


Entry posted by Ryan Lowe | No comment

Add to: delicious | digg | reddit | netscape | Google Bookmarks

01:53 Map-Reduce for Machine Learning on Multicore » High Scalability - Building bigger, faster, more reliable websites.

We are at the beginning of the multicore era. Computers will have increasingly many cores (processors), but there is still no good programming framework for these architectures, and thus no simple and unified way for machine learning to take advantage of the potential speed up.
In this paper, we develop a broadly applicable parallel programming method, one that is easily applied to many different learning algorithms. Our work is in distinct contrast to the tradition in machine learning of designing (often ingenious) ways to speed up a single algorithm at a time.
Specifically, we show that algorithms that fit the Statistical Query model can be written in a certain “summation form,” which allows them to be easily parallelized on multicore computers. We adapt Google’s map-reduce paradigm to demonstrate this parallel speed up technique on a variety of learning algorithms including locally weighted linear regression (LWLR), k-means, logistic regression (LR), naive Bayes (NB), SVM, ICA, PCA, gaussian discriminant analysis (GDA), EM, and backpropagation (NN). Our experimental results show basically linear speedup with an increasing number of processors.

Read more about this study here (PDF - you can download also)

01:42 Scale-up vs. Scale-out: A Case Study by IBM using Nutch/Lucene » High Scalability - Building bigger, faster, more reliable websites.

Scale-up solutions in the form of large SMPs have represented the mainstream of commercial computing for the past several years. The major server vendors continue to provide increasingly larger and more powerful machines. More recently, scale-out solutions, in the form of clusters of smaller machines, have gained increased acceptance for commercial computing.
Scale-out solutions are particularly effective in high-throughput web-centric applications.
In this paper, we investigate the behavior of two competing approaches to parallelism, scale-up and scale-out, in an emerging search application. Our conclusions show that a scale-out strategy can be the key to good performance even on a scale-up machine.
Furthermore, scale-out solutions offer better price/performance, although at an increase in management complexity.

Read more about scaling out/up and about the conclusions here (PDF - you can also download it)


^==Back Home: www.chedong.com

^==Back Digest Home: www.chedong.com/digest/

<== 2009-04-26
  四月 2009  
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      
==> 2009-04-28