man > git-filter-branch(1)

TLDR: git-filter-branch (tldr-pages)

Change branch history, like removing files.

  • Remove a file from all commits
    git filter-branch --tree-filter 'rm {{-f|--force}} {{file}}' HEAD
  • Update author email
    git filter-branch --env-filter 'GIT_AUTHOR_EMAIL={{new_email}}' HEAD
  • Delete a folder from history
    git filter-branch --tree-filter 'rm {{-rf|--recursive --force}} {{folder}}' HEAD
GIT-FILTER-BRANCH(1)                         Git Manual                         GIT-FILTER-BRANCH(1)



NAME
       git-filter-branch - Rewrite branches

SYNOPSIS
       git filter-branch [--setup <command>] [--subdirectory-filter <directory>]
               [--env-filter <command>] [--tree-filter <command>]
               [--index-filter <command>] [--parent-filter <command>]
               [--msg-filter <command>] [--commit-filter <command>]
               [--tag-name-filter <command>] [--prune-empty]
               [--original <namespace>] [-d <directory>] [-f | --force]
               [--state-branch <branch>] [--] [<rev-list options>...]


WARNING
       git filter-branch has a plethora of pitfalls that can produce non-obvious manglings of the
       intended history rewrite (and can leave you with little time to investigate such problems
       since it has such abysmal performance). These safety and performance issues cannot be
       backward compatibly fixed and as such, its use is not recommended. Please use an alternative
       history filtering tool such as git filter-repo[1]. If you still need to use git
       filter-branch, please carefully read the section called “SAFETY” (and the section called
       “PERFORMANCE”) to learn about the land mines of filter-branch, and then vigilantly avoid as
       many of the hazards listed there as reasonably possible.

DESCRIPTION
       Lets you rewrite Git revision history by rewriting the branches mentioned in the <rev-list
       options>, applying custom filters on each revision. Those filters can modify each tree (e.g.
       removing a file or running a perl rewrite on all files) or information about each commit.
       Otherwise, all information (including original commit times or merge information) will be
       preserved.

       The command will only rewrite the positive refs mentioned in the command line (e.g. if you
       pass a..b, only b will be rewritten). If you specify no filters, the commits will be
       recommitted without any changes, which would normally have no effect. Nevertheless, this may
       be useful in the future for compensating for some Git bugs or such, therefore such a usage is
       permitted.

       NOTE: This command honors .git/info/grafts file and refs in the refs/replace/ namespace. If
       you have any grafts or replacement refs defined, running this command will make them
       permanent.

       WARNING! The rewritten history will have different object names for all the objects and will
       not converge with the original branch. You will not be able to easily push and distribute the
       rewritten branch on top of the original branch. Please do not use this command if you do not
       know the full implications, and avoid using it anyway, if a simple single commit would
       suffice to fix your problem. (See the "RECOVERING FROM UPSTREAM REBASE" section in git-
       rebase(1) for further information about rewriting published history.)

       Always verify that the rewritten version is correct: The original refs, if different from the
       rewritten ones, will be stored in the namespace refs/original/.

       Note that since this operation is very I/O expensive, it might be a good idea to redirect the
       temporary directory off-disk with the -d option, e.g. on tmpfs. Reportedly the speedup is
       very noticeable.

   Filters
       The filters are applied in the order as listed below. The <command> argument is always
       evaluated in the shell context using the eval command (with the notable exception of the
       commit filter, for technical reasons). Prior to that, the $GIT_COMMIT environment variable
       will be set to contain the id of the commit being rewritten. Also, GIT_AUTHOR_NAME,
       GIT_AUTHOR_EMAIL, GIT_AUTHOR_DATE, GIT_COMMITTER_NAME, GIT_COMMITTER_EMAIL, and
       GIT_COMMITTER_DATE are taken from the current commit and exported to the environment, in
       order to affect the author and committer identities of the replacement commit created by git-
       commit-tree(1) after the filters have run.

       If any evaluation of <command> returns a non-zero exit status, the whole operation will be
       aborted.

       A map function is available that takes an "original sha1 id" argument and outputs a
       "rewritten sha1 id" if the commit has been already rewritten, and "original sha1 id"
       otherwise; the map function can return several ids on separate lines if your commit filter
       emitted multiple commits.

OPTIONS
       --setup <command>
           This is not a real filter executed for each commit but a one time setup just before the
           loop. Therefore no commit-specific variables are defined yet. Functions or variables
           defined here can be used or modified in the following filter steps except the commit
           filter, for technical reasons.

       --subdirectory-filter <directory>
           Only look at the history which touches the given subdirectory. The result will contain
           that directory (and only that) as its project root. Implies the section called “Remap to
           ancestor”.

       --env-filter <command>
           This filter may be used if you only need to modify the environment in which the commit
           will be performed. Specifically, you might want to rewrite the author/committer
           name/email/time environment variables (see git-commit-tree(1) for details).

       --tree-filter <command>
           This is the filter for rewriting the tree and its contents. The argument is evaluated in
           shell with the working directory set to the root of the checked out tree. The new tree is
           then used as-is (new files are auto-added, disappeared files are auto-removed - neither
           .gitignore files nor any other ignore rules HAVE ANY EFFECT!).

       --index-filter <command>
           This is the filter for rewriting the index. It is similar to the tree filter but does not
           check out the tree, which makes it much faster. Frequently used with git rm --cached
           --ignore-unmatch ..., see EXAMPLES below. For hairy cases, see git-update-index(1).

       --parent-filter <command>
           This is the filter for rewriting the commit’s parent list. It will receive the parent
           string on stdin and shall output the new parent string on stdout. The parent string is in
           the format described in git-commit-tree(1): empty for the initial commit, "-p parent" for
           a normal commit and "-p parent1 -p parent2 -p parent3 ..." for a merge commit.

       --msg-filter <command>
           This is the filter for rewriting the commit messages. The argument is evaluated in the
           shell with the original commit message on standard input; its standard output is used as
           the new commit message.

       --commit-filter <command>
           This is the filter for performing the commit. If this filter is specified, it will be
           called instead of the git commit-tree command, with arguments of the form "<TREE_ID> [(-p
           <PARENT_COMMIT_ID>)...]" and the log message on stdin. The commit id is expected on
           stdout.

           As a special extension, the commit filter may emit multiple commit ids; in that case, the
           rewritten children of the original commit will have all of them as parents.

           You can use the map convenience function in this filter, and other convenience functions,
           too. For example, calling skip_commit "$@" will leave out the current commit (but not its
           changes! If you want that, use git rebase instead).

           You can also use the git_commit_non_empty_tree "$@" instead of git commit-tree "$@" if
           you don’t wish to keep commits with a single parent and that makes no change to the tree.

       --tag-name-filter <command>
           This is the filter for rewriting tag names. When passed, it will be called for every tag
           ref that points to a rewritten object (or to a tag object which points to a rewritten
           object). The original tag name is passed via standard input, and the new tag name is
           expected on standard output.

           The original tags are not deleted, but can be overwritten; use "--tag-name-filter cat" to
           simply update the tags. In this case, be very careful and make sure you have the old tags
           backed up in case the conversion has run afoul.

           Nearly proper rewriting of tag objects is supported. If the tag has a message attached, a
           new tag object will be created with the same message, author, and timestamp. If the tag
           has a signature attached, the signature will be stripped. It is by definition impossible
           to preserve signatures. The reason this is "nearly" proper, is because ideally if the tag
           did not change (points to the same object, has the same name, etc.) it should retain any
           signature. That is not the case, signatures will always be removed, buyer beware. There
           is also no support for changing the author or timestamp (or the tag message for that
           matter). Tags which point to other tags will be rewritten to point to the underlying
           commit.

       --prune-empty
           Some filters will generate empty commits that leave the tree untouched. This option
           instructs git-filter-branch to remove such commits if they have exactly one or zero
           non-pruned parents; merge commits will therefore remain intact. This option cannot be
           used together with --commit-filter, though the same effect can be achieved by using the
           provided git_commit_non_empty_tree function in a commit filter.

       --original <namespace>
           Use this option to set the namespace where the original commits will be stored. The
           default value is refs/original.

       -d <directory>
           Use this option to set the path to the temporary directory used for rewriting. When
           applying a tree filter, the command needs to temporarily check out the tree to some
           directory, which may consume considerable space in case of large projects. By default it
           does this in the .git-rewrite/ directory but you can override that choice by this
           parameter.

       -f, --force
           git filter-branch refuses to start with an existing temporary directory or when there are
           already refs starting with refs/original/, unless forced.

       --state-branch <branch>
           This option will cause the mapping from old to new objects to be loaded from named branch
           upon startup and saved as a new commit to that branch upon exit, enabling incremental of
           large trees. If <branch> does not exist it will be created.

       <rev-list options>...
           Arguments for git rev-list. All positive refs included by these options are rewritten.
           You may also specify options such as --all, but you must use -- to separate them from the
           git filter-branch options. Implies the section called “Remap to ancestor”.

   Remap to ancestor
       By using git-rev-list(1) arguments, e.g., path limiters, you can limit the set of revisions
       which get rewritten. However, positive refs on the command line are distinguished: we don’t
       let them be excluded by such limiters. For this purpose, they are instead rewritten to point
       at the nearest ancestor that was not excluded.

EXIT STATUS
       On success, the exit status is 0. If the filter can’t find any commits to rewrite, the exit
       status is 2. On any other error, the exit status may be any other non-zero value.

EXAMPLES
       Suppose you want to remove a file (containing confidential information or copyright
       violation) from all commits:

           git filter-branch --tree-filter 'rm filename' HEAD


       However, if the file is absent from the tree of some commit, a simple rm filename will fail
       for that tree and commit. Thus you may instead want to use rm -f filename as the script.

       Using --index-filter with git rm yields a significantly faster version. Like with using rm
       filename, git rm --cached filename will fail if the file is absent from the tree of a commit.
       If you want to "completely forget" a file, it does not matter when it entered history, so we
       also add --ignore-unmatch:

           git filter-branch --index-filter 'git rm --cached --ignore-unmatch filename' HEAD


       Now, you will get the rewritten history saved in HEAD.

       To rewrite the repository to look as if foodir/ had been its project root, and discard all
       other history:

           git filter-branch --subdirectory-filter foodir -- --all


       Thus you can, e.g., turn a library subdirectory into a repository of its own. Note the --
       that separates filter-branch options from revision options, and the --all to rewrite all
       branches and tags.

       To set a commit (which typically is at the tip of another history) to be the parent of the
       current initial commit, in order to paste the other history behind the current history:

           git filter-branch --parent-filter 'sed "s/^\$/-p <graft-id>/"' HEAD


       (if the parent string is empty - which happens when we are dealing with the initial commit -
       add graftcommit as a parent). Note that this assumes history with a single root (that is, no
       merge without common ancestors happened). If this is not the case, use:

           git filter-branch --parent-filter \
                   'test $GIT_COMMIT = <commit-id> && echo "-p <graft-id>" || cat' HEAD


       or even simpler:

           git replace --graft $commit-id $graft-id
           git filter-branch $graft-id..HEAD


       To remove commits authored by "Darl McBribe" from the history:

           git filter-branch --commit-filter '
                   if [ "$GIT_AUTHOR_NAME" = "Darl McBribe" ];
                   then
                           skip_commit "$@";
                   else
                           git commit-tree "$@";
                   fi' HEAD


       The function skip_commit is defined as follows:

           skip_commit()
           {
                   shift;
                   while [ -n "$1" ];
                   do
                           shift;
                           map "$1";
                           shift;
                   done;
           }


       The shift magic first throws away the tree id and then the -p parameters. Note that this
       handles merges properly! In case Darl committed a merge between P1 and P2, it will be
       propagated properly and all children of the merge will become merge commits with P1,P2 as
       their parents instead of the merge commit.

       NOTE the changes introduced by the commits, and which are not reverted by subsequent commits,
       will still be in the rewritten branch. If you want to throw out changes together with the
       commits, you should use the interactive mode of git rebase.

       You can rewrite the commit log messages using --msg-filter. For example, git svn-id strings
       in a repository created by git svn can be removed this way:

           git filter-branch --msg-filter '
                   sed -e "/^git-svn-id:/d"
           '


       If you need to add Acked-by lines to, say, the last 10 commits (none of which is a merge),
       use this command:

           git filter-branch --msg-filter '
                   cat &&
                   echo "Acked-by: Bugs Bunny <bunny AT bugzilla.org>"
           ' HEAD~10..HEAD


       The --env-filter option can be used to modify committer and/or author identity. For example,
       if you found out that your commits have the wrong identity due to a misconfigured user.email,
       you can make a correction, before publishing the project, like this:

           git filter-branch --env-filter '
                   if test "$GIT_AUTHOR_EMAIL" = "root@localhost"
                   then
                           GIT_AUTHOR_EMAIL=john AT example.com
                   fi
                   if test "$GIT_COMMITTER_EMAIL" = "root@localhost"
                   then
                           GIT_COMMITTER_EMAIL=john AT example.com
                   fi
           ' -- --all


       To restrict rewriting to only part of the history, specify a revision range in addition to
       the new branch name. The new branch name will point to the top-most revision that a git
       rev-list of this range will print.

       Consider this history:

                D--E--F--G--H
               /     /
           A--B-----C


       To rewrite only commits D,E,F,G,H, but leave A, B and C alone, use:

           git filter-branch ... C..H


       To rewrite commits E,F,G,H, use one of these:

           git filter-branch ... C..H --not D
           git filter-branch ... D..H --not C


       To move the whole tree into a subdirectory, or remove it from there:

           git filter-branch --index-filter \
                   'git ls-files -s | sed "s-\t\"*-&newsubdir/-" |
                           GIT_INDEX_FILE=$GIT_INDEX_FILE.new \
                                   git update-index --index-info &&
                    mv "$GIT_INDEX_FILE.new" "$GIT_INDEX_FILE"' HEAD


CHECKLIST FOR SHRINKING A REPOSITORY
       git-filter-branch can be used to get rid of a subset of files, usually with some combination
       of --index-filter and --subdirectory-filter. People expect the resulting repository to be
       smaller than the original, but you need a few more steps to actually make it smaller, because
       Git tries hard not to lose your objects until you tell it to. First make sure that:

       •   You really removed all variants of a filename, if a blob was moved over its lifetime.
           git log --name-only --follow --all -- filename can help you find renames.

       •   You really filtered all refs: use --tag-name-filter cat -- --all when calling
           git-filter-branch.

       Then there are two ways to get a smaller repository. A safer way is to clone, that keeps your
       original intact.

       •   Clone it with git clone file:///path/to/repo. The clone will not have the removed
           objects. See git-clone(1). (Note that cloning with a plain path just hardlinks
           everything!)

       If you really don’t want to clone it, for whatever reasons, check the following points
       instead (in this order). This is a very destructive approach, so make a backup or go back to
       cloning it. You have been warned.

       •   Remove the original refs backed up by git-filter-branch: say git for-each-ref
           --format="%(refname)" refs/original/ | xargs -n 1 git update-ref -d.

       •   Expire all reflogs with git reflog expire --expire=now --all.

       •   Garbage collect all unreferenced objects with git gc --prune=now (or if your git-gc is
           not new enough to support arguments to --prune, use git repack -ad; git prune instead).

PERFORMANCE
       The performance of git-filter-branch is glacially slow; its design makes it impossible for a
       backward-compatible implementation to ever be fast:

       •   In editing files, git-filter-branch by design checks out each and every commit as it
           existed in the original repo. If your repo has 10^5 files and 10^5 commits, but each
           commit only modifies five files, then git-filter-branch will make you do 10^10
           modifications, despite only having (at most) 5*10^5 unique blobs.

       •   If you try and cheat and try to make git-filter-branch only work on files modified in a
           commit, then two things happen

           •   you run into problems with deletions whenever the user is simply trying to rename
               files (because attempting to delete files that don’t exist looks like a no-op; it
               takes some chicanery to remap deletes across file renames when the renames happen via
               arbitrary user-provided shell)

           •   even if you succeed at the map-deletes-for-renames chicanery, you still technically
               violate backward compatibility because users are allowed to filter files in ways that
               depend upon topology of commits instead of filtering solely based on file contents or
               names (though this has not been observed in the wild).

       •   Even if you don’t need to edit files but only want to e.g. rename or remove some and thus
           can avoid checking out each file (i.e. you can use --index-filter), you still are passing
           shell snippets for your filters. This means that for every commit, you have to have a
           prepared git repo where those filters can be run. That’s a significant setup.

       •   Further, several additional files are created or updated per commit by git-filter-branch.
           Some of these are for supporting the convenience functions provided by git-filter-branch
           (such as map()), while others are for keeping track of internal state (but could have
           also been accessed by user filters; one of git-filter-branch’s regression tests does so).
           This essentially amounts to using the filesystem as an IPC mechanism between
           git-filter-branch and the user-provided filters. Disks tend to be a slow IPC mechanism,
           and writing these files also effectively represents a forced synchronization point
           between separate processes that we hit with every commit.

       •   The user-provided shell commands will likely involve a pipeline of commands, resulting in
           the creation of many processes per commit. Creating and running another process takes a
           widely varying amount of time between operating systems, but on any platform it is very
           slow relative to invoking a function.

       •   git-filter-branch itself is written in shell, which is kind of slow. This is the one
           performance issue that could be backward-compatibly fixed, but compared to the above
           problems that are intrinsic to the design of git-filter-branch, the language of the tool
           itself is a relatively minor issue.

           •   Side note: Unfortunately, people tend to fixate on the written-in-shell aspect and
               periodically ask if git-filter-branch could be rewritten in another language to fix
               the performance issues. Not only does that ignore the bigger intrinsic problems with
               the design, it’d help less than you’d expect: if git-filter-branch itself were not
               shell, then the convenience functions (map(), skip_commit(), etc) and the --setup
               argument could no longer be executed once at the beginning of the program but would
               instead need to be prepended to every user filter (and thus re-executed with every
               commit).

       The git filter-repo[1] tool is an alternative to git-filter-branch which does not suffer from
       these performance problems or the safety problems (mentioned below). For those with existing
       tooling which relies upon git-filter-branch, git filter-repo also provides filter-lamely[2],
       a drop-in git-filter-branch replacement (with a few caveats). While filter-lamely suffers
       from all the same safety issues as git-filter-branch, it at least ameliorates the performance
       issues a little.

SAFETY
       git-filter-branch is riddled with gotchas resulting in various ways to easily corrupt repos
       or end up with a mess worse than what you started with:

       •   Someone can have a set of "working and tested filters" which they document or provide to
           a coworker, who then runs them on a different OS where the same commands are not
           working/tested (some examples in the git-filter-branch manpage are also affected by
           this). BSD vs. GNU userland differences can really bite. If lucky, error messages are
           spewed. But just as likely, the commands either don’t do the filtering requested, or
           silently corrupt by making some unwanted change. The unwanted change may only affect a
           few commits, so it’s not necessarily obvious either. (The fact that problems won’t
           necessarily be obvious means they are likely to go unnoticed until the rewritten history
           is in use for quite a while, at which point it’s really hard to justify another flag-day
           for another rewrite.)

       •   Filenames with spaces are often mishandled by shell snippets since they cause problems
           for shell pipelines. Not everyone is familiar with find -print0, xargs -0, git-ls-files
           -z, etc. Even people who are familiar with these may assume such flags are not relevant
           because someone else renamed any such files in their repo back before the person doing
           the filtering joined the project. And often, even those familiar with handling arguments
           with spaces may not do so just because they aren’t in the mindset of thinking about
           everything that could possibly go wrong.

       •   Non-ascii filenames can be silently removed despite being in a desired directory. Keeping
           only wanted paths is often done using pipelines like git ls-files | grep -v ^WANTED_DIR/
           | xargs git rm. ls-files will only quote filenames if needed, so folks may not notice
           that one of the files didn’t match the regex (at least not until it’s much too late).
           Yes, someone who knows about core.quotePath can avoid this (unless they have other
           special characters like \t, \n, or "), and people who use ls-files -z with something
           other than grep can avoid this, but that doesn’t mean they will.

       •   Similarly, when moving files around, one can find that filenames with non-ascii or
           special characters end up in a different directory, one that includes a double quote
           character. (This is technically the same issue as above with quoting, but perhaps an
           interesting different way that it can and has manifested as a problem.)

       •   It’s far too easy to accidentally mix up old and new history. It’s still possible with
           any tool, but git-filter-branch almost invites it. If lucky, the only downside is users
           getting frustrated that they don’t know how to shrink their repo and remove the old
           stuff. If unlucky, they merge old and new history and end up with multiple "copies" of
           each commit, some of which have unwanted or sensitive files and others which don’t. This
           comes about in multiple different ways:

           •   the default to only doing a partial history rewrite (--all is not the default and few
               examples show it)

           •   the fact that there’s no automatic post-run cleanup

           •   the fact that --tag-name-filter (when used to rename tags) doesn’t remove the old
               tags but just adds new ones with the new name

           •   the fact that little educational information is provided to inform users of the
               ramifications of a rewrite and how to avoid mixing old and new history. For example,
               this man page discusses how users need to understand that they need to rebase their
               changes for all their branches on top of new history (or delete and reclone), but
               that’s only one of multiple concerns to consider. See the "DISCUSSION" section of the
               git filter-repo manual page for more details.

       •   Annotated tags can be accidentally converted to lightweight tags, due to either of two
           issues:

           •   Someone can do a history rewrite, realize they messed up, restore from the backups in
               refs/original/, and then redo their git-filter-branch command. (The backup in
               refs/original/ is not a real backup; it dereferences tags first.)

           •   Running git-filter-branch with either --tags or --all in your <rev-list options>. In
               order to retain annotated tags as annotated, you must use --tag-name-filter (and must
               not have restored from refs/original/ in a previously botched rewrite).

       •   Any commit messages that specify an encoding will become corrupted by the rewrite;
           git-filter-branch ignores the encoding, takes the original bytes, and feeds it to
           commit-tree without telling it the proper encoding. (This happens whether or not
           --msg-filter is used.)

       •   Commit messages (even if they are all UTF-8) by default become corrupted due to not being
           updated — any references to other commit hashes in commit messages will now refer to
           no-longer-extant commits.

       •   There are no facilities for helping users find what unwanted crud they should delete,
           which means they are much more likely to have incomplete or partial cleanups that
           sometimes result in confusion and people wasting time trying to understand. (For example,
           folks tend to just look for big files to delete instead of big directories or extensions,
           and once they do so, then sometime later folks using the new repository who are going
           through history will notice a build artifact directory that has some files but not
           others, or a cache of dependencies (node_modules or similar) which couldn’t have ever
           been functional since it’s missing some files.)

       •   If --prune-empty isn’t specified, then the filtering process can create hoards of
           confusing empty commits

       •   If --prune-empty is specified, then intentionally placed empty commits from before the
           filtering operation are also pruned instead of just pruning commits that became empty due
           to filtering rules.

       •   If --prune-empty is specified, sometimes empty commits are missed and left around anyway
           (a somewhat rare bug, but it happens...)

       •   A minor issue, but users who have a goal to update all names and emails in a repository
           may be led to --env-filter which will only update authors and committers, missing
           taggers.

       •   If the user provides a --tag-name-filter that maps multiple tags to the same name, no
           warning or error is provided; git-filter-branch simply overwrites each tag in some
           undocumented pre-defined order resulting in only one tag at the end. (A git-filter-branch
           regression test requires this surprising behavior.)

       Also, the poor performance of git-filter-branch often leads to safety issues:

       •   Coming up with the correct shell snippet to do the filtering you want is sometimes
           difficult unless you’re just doing a trivial modification such as deleting a couple
           files. Unfortunately, people often learn if the snippet is right or wrong by trying it
           out, but the rightness or wrongness can vary depending on special circumstances (spaces
           in filenames, non-ascii filenames, funny author names or emails, invalid timezones,
           presence of grafts or replace objects, etc.), meaning they may have to wait a long time,
           hit an error, then restart. The performance of git-filter-branch is so bad that this
           cycle is painful, reducing the time available to carefully re-check (to say nothing about
           what it does to the patience of the person doing the rewrite even if they do technically
           have more time available). This problem is extra compounded because errors from broken
           filters may not be shown for a long time and/or get lost in a sea of output. Even worse,
           broken filters often just result in silent incorrect rewrites.

       •   To top it all off, even when users finally find working commands, they naturally want to
           share them. But they may be unaware that their repo didn’t have some special cases that
           someone else’s does. So, when someone else with a different repository runs the same
           commands, they get hit by the problems above. Or, the user just runs commands that really
           were vetted for special cases, but they run it on a different OS where it doesn’t work,
           as noted above.

GIT
       Part of the git(1) suite

NOTES
        1. git filter-repo
           https://github.com/newren/git-filter-repo/

        2. filter-lamely
           https://github.com/newren/git-filter-repo/blob/master/contrib/filter-repo-demos/filter-lamely



Git 2.34.1                                   02/26/2026                         GIT-FILTER-BRANCH(1)
git-filter-branch(1)
NAME SYNOPSIS WARNING DESCRIPTION
Filters
OPTIONS
--prune-empty -f, --force Remap to ancestor
EXIT STATUS EXAMPLES CHECKLIST FOR SHRINKING A REPOSITORY PERFORMANCE SAFETY GIT NOTES

Generated by phpman v4.9.22-1-g1b0fcb4 · Markdown · JSON · MCP Author: Che Dong Under GNU General Public License
2026-07-05 06:05 @216.73.216.52
CrawledBy Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)
Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional!Valid CSS!

^_top_^