# phpman > man > pnmnlfilt(1)

> **TLDR:** Apply a non-linear filter onto a PNM image.
>
- Apply the "alpha trimmed mean" filter with the specified alpha and radius values onto the PNM image:
  `pnmnlfilt {{0.0..0.5}} {{radius}} {{path/to/image.pnm}} > {{path/to/output.pnm}}`
- Apply the "optimal estimation smoothing" filter with the specified noise threshold and radius onto the PNM image:
  `pnmnlfilt {{1.0..2.0}} {{radius}} {{path/to/image.pnm}} > {{path/to/output.pnm}}`
- Apply the "edge enhancement" filter with the specified alpha and radius onto the PNM image:
  `pnmnlfilt {{0.9..(-0.1)}} {{radius}} {{path/to/image.pnm}} > {{path/to/output.pnm}}`

*Source: tldr-pages*

---

[pnmnlfilt(1)](https://www.chedong.com/phpMan.php/man/pnmnlfilt/1/markdown)                           General Commands Manual                          [pnmnlfilt(1)](https://www.chedong.com/phpMan.php/man/pnmnlfilt/1/markdown)



## NAME
       pnmnlfilt  -  non-linear filters: smooth, alpha trim mean, optimal estimation smoothing, edge
       enhancement.

## SYNOPSIS
       **pnmnlfilt** _alpha_ _radius_ [_pnmfile_]


## DESCRIPTION
       **pnmnlfilt** produces an output image where the pixels are a summary of multiple pixels near the
       corresponding location in an input image.

       This program works on multi-image streams.

       This  is something of a swiss army knife filter. It has 3 distinct operating modes. In all of
       the modes each pixel in the image is examined and processed according to it and its surround‐
       ing  pixels  values.  Rather than using the 9 pixels in a 3x3 block, 7 hexagonal area samples
       are taken, the size of the hexagons being controlled by the radius parameter. A radius  value
       of  0.3333 means that the 7 hexagons exactly fit into the center pixel (ie.  there will be no
       filtering effect). A radius value of 1.0 means that the 7 hexagons exactly fit  a  3x3  pixel
       array.

### Alpha trimmed mean filter.    (0.0 <= alpha <= 0.5)
       The value of the center pixel will be replaced by the mean of the 7 hexagon values, but the 7
       values are sorted by size and the top and bottom alpha portion of the 7 are excluded from the
       mean.  This implies that an alpha value of 0.0 gives the same sort of output as a normal con‐
       volution (ie. averaging or smoothing filter), where radius will determine the  "strength"  of
       the filter. A good value to start from for subtle filtering is alpha = 0.0, radius = 0.55 For
       a more blatant effect, try alpha 0.0 and radius 1.0

       An alpha value of 0.5 will cause the median value of the 7 hexagons to be used to replace the
       center  pixel  value. This sort of filter is good for eliminating "pop" or single pixel noise
       from an image without spreading the noise out or smudging features on  the  image.  Judicious
       use  of  the radius parameter will fine tune the filtering. Intermediate values of alpha give
       effects somewhere between smoothing and "pop"  noise  reduction.  For  subtle  filtering  try
       starting with values of alpha = 0.4, radius = 0.6  For a more blatant effect try alpha = 0.5,
       radius = 1.0

### Optimal estimation smoothing. (1.0 <= alpha <= 2.0)
       This type of filter applies a smoothing filter adaptively over the image.  For each pixel the
       variance of the surrounding hexagon values is calculated, and the amount of smoothing is made
       inversely proportional to it. The idea is that if the variance is small then  it  is  due  to
       noise in the image, while if the variance is large, it is because of "wanted" image features.
       As usual the radius parameter controls the effective radius, but  it  probably  advisable  to
       leave  the radius between 0.8 and 1.0 for the variance calculation to be meaningful.  The al‐
       pha parameter sets the noise threshold, over which less smoothing will be done.   This  means
       that  small  values  of  alpha will give the most subtle filtering effect, while large values
       will tend to smooth all parts of the image. You could start with values like alpha = 1.2, ra‐
       dius  =  1.0  and try increasing or decreasing the alpha parameter to get the desired effect.
       This type of filter is best for filtering out dithering noise in both bitmap  and  color  im‐
       ages.

### Edge enhancement. (-0.1 >= alpha >= -0.9)
       This is the opposite type of filter to the smoothing filter. It enhances edges. The alpha pa‐
       rameter controls the amount of edge enhancement, from subtle (-0.1) to  blatant  (-0.9).  The
       radius  parameter  controls  the effective radius as usual, but useful values are between 0.5
       and 0.9. Try starting with values of alpha = 0.3, radius = 0.8

### Combination use.
       The various modes of **pnmnlfilt** can be used one after the other to get the desired result. For
       instance  to turn a monochrome dithered image into a grayscale image you could try one or two
       passes of the smoothing filter, followed by a pass of the  optimal  estimation  filter,  then
       some  subtle  edge  enhancement. Note that using edge enhancement is only likely to be useful
       after one of the non-linear filters (alpha trimmed mean or  optimal  estimation  filter),  as
       edge enhancement is the direct opposite of smoothing.

       For  reducing  color  quantization  noise  in images (ie. turning .gif files back into 24 bit
       files) you could try a pass of the optimal estimation filter (alpha 1.2, radius 1.0), a  pass
       of  the  median  filter (alpha 0.5, radius 0.55), and possibly a pass of the edge enhancement
       filter.  Several passes of the optimal estimation filter with declining alpha values are more
       effective than a single pass with a large alpha value.  As usual, there is a tradeoff between
       filtering effectiveness and loosing detail. Experimentation is encouraged.

**References:**
       The alpha-trimmed mean filter is based on the description in IEEE CG&A May 1990  Page  23  by
       Mark  E.  Lee  and Richard A. Redner, and has been enhanced to allow continuous alpha adjust‐
       ment.

       The optimal estimation filter is taken from an article "Converting Dithered  Images  Back  to
       Gray  Scale"  by Allen Stenger, Dr Dobb's Journal, November 1992, and this article references
       "Digital Image Enhancement and Noise Filtering by Use of  Local  Statistics",  Jong-Sen  Lee,
       IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, March 1980.

       The edge enhancement details are from [pgmenhance(1)](https://www.chedong.com/phpMan.php/man/pgmenhance/1/markdown), which is taken from Philip R. Thompson's
       "xim" program, which in turn took it from section 6 of "Digital Halftones by Dot  Diffusion",
       D.  E.  Knuth,  ACM Transaction on Graphics Vol. 6, No. 4, October 1987, which in turn got it
       from two 1976 papers by J. F. Jarvis et. al.

## SEE ALSO
       [pgmenhance(1)](https://www.chedong.com/phpMan.php/man/pgmenhance/1/markdown), [pnmconvol(1)](https://www.chedong.com/phpMan.php/man/pnmconvol/1/markdown), [pnm(5)](https://www.chedong.com/phpMan.php/man/pnm/5/markdown)

## BUGS
       Integers and tables may overflow if PPM_MAXMAXVAL is greater than 255.

## AUTHOR
       Graeme W. Gill    <graeme@labtam.oz.au>



                                           5 February 1993                              [pnmnlfilt(1)](https://www.chedong.com/phpMan.php/man/pnmnlfilt/1/markdown)
